I’ll be the first to admit it, I love Google.
How on earth are you supposed to look something up without Google?
I always remember Hank Scorpio asking Homer Simpson if he knew who invented the hammock. And of course he didn’t know who invented the hammock. So Hank Scopio says to Homer, “There’s something for you to do: find that out.”
Find out who invented the hammock without Google? That’s a huge task. Without Google I would have had to walk to the library and open a book instead of immediately finding out that hammocks were invited by Native Americans in the West Indies and brought back to Europe by Spanish colonists (also maybe hammocks were invented by the Ancient Greeks, no one knows for sure. Hammocks been around a long time).
Google has made all of our lives easier and therefore better by providing us with the fastest way to find things on the internet.
So Eden sank to grief, so dawn goes down to day. Nothing gold can stay.
What this Robert Frost quote means is that even in all its glory, Google may not last forever simply because nothing gold can stay.
More and more Google seems to be removing internet porn from itself. They’ve made it harder to find porn on Google Images, they banned porn from Google Glass (even though the only purpose anyone can think of for Google Glass is POV porn) and they’ve banned the monetization of porn on Blogger. Though they aren’t officially going porn-free, it sure looks like Google is moving in that direction.
Because I’m such a big fan of Google (did you guys see The Internship?), I decided to run a poll to see how you guys would react to a porn-free Google. Read more…
As you can see from this “official” chart, roughly 33% of people use Google to find porn.
While finding porn is still behind spellcheck in terms of usages for Google, using Google to find useful information (its intended use) still ranks dead last.
This chart is a joke that someone made. But with Google’s recent vendetta against internet porn, you have to wonder if someone at Mountain View saw the joke chart and decided that Google is too good for internet porn. It would explain Google’s recent offensive on internet porn.
Google’s latest attempt to stifle internet porn began yesterday when Blogger (formerly known as Blogspot) users received messages saying that the free blogging platform will no longer allow the monetization of adult content. Here is a copy of the message for those of you who are interested: Read more…
If there’s one thing that I’ve learned from Google Street View it’s that people will literally have sex anywhere and they don’t care if there’s a Googl0 Street View car coming their way. First there was people having sex in the dressing room. Then Google caught an alley handjob in Manchester.
Well now we have another entry in our on-going coverage of sex caught on Google Street View. This time from the side of a highway in South Australia. Read more…
Remember when we saw two legs in a dressing room on Google Storeview and thought that was the coolest thing? Unfortunately, it turned out to be a hoax. But last week the Google Sightseeing blog found something on Google Streetview that’s more explicit/hilarious than just two legs in a dressing room. They spotted a real live prostitute giving a handjob to a guy on one of Machester’s scenic backstreets.
As you would expect, Google has censored the handjob. But also as you would expect, we’ve gotten our hands on the photos. So let’s all enjoy these hilarious NSFW Google Streetview handjob photos. Read more…
When Google launched Store View in 2010, the feature of Google Maps that allows people to have all the fun of browsing around a store without buying anything from the comfort of their computer screen, it was predictably less hilarious or interesting than Google Street View.
It took a while but finally we have some candid hilarity on Google Store View (thanks for the tip, Gawker).
While capturing skate and snowboard store Krakatoa in Briançon, France, one of Google’s cameramen accidentally caught a couple having sex in a dressing room.
Well, we presume they are having, about to have, or just had sex because all we can see are two pairs of legs with underwear around the ankles. What other possible reason would there be for going into a change room with someone? It’s not to try on clothes! That’s for damn sure.
Let’s take a look:
A federal court judge has ruled that a New Jersey mother’s lawsuit against the Meredith Corporation, a production company based out of Iowa, could proceed. In 2010, Sahoury appeared in an instructional breast-feeding video for Parent TV with her month-old daughter.
Months after signing the release for the program, Sahoury googled herself. Normally a harmless act of curiosity but she was shocked to find hundreds of porn links with her name.
When she clicked one of the links, she found that the breast-feeding footage had been spliced with video of a woman of “similar features and stature” performing sexual acts.
Shocking, yes. But it gets worse…