Everyone’s talking about The Daily Show right now because Jon Stewart announced he’ll be leaving sometime this year.
Female condoms are a relatively new and experimental thing, but they’re slowly but surely being rolled onto the market, which is probably good news for all of you lazy/stupid dudes out there who can’t be bothered to spend 10 seconds to open up a condom and put it on their dicks.
The article in question basically re-iterates what I just said:
“Many men just refuse to use condoms, so if a woman’s partner refuses to use a condom or complains about a condom, she can say I’ll use one,” Herbenick says. “It provides a female-initiated or a female-controlled option.”
The problem with female condoms in their current state is that they’re pretty unwieldy. They don’t fit very well. They’re probably pretty uncomfortable to wear, especially since they’ve been described as ‘baggy’ and ‘big.’ That sounds terrible.
The project is funded by the Gates foundation, which works to promote and fund world health initiatives.
Listen, this is a good/great thing. The more viable contraceptive products there are on the market, the better. I get that some guys don’t like using condoms. Hell, I don’t even like using them. But I do. Because you HAVE to, especially if your partner isn’t using some other form of contraceptive, and probably even if they are.
According to the study, less than 1% of the condoms in the world are female condoms. That’s a massive problem, because it takes a lot of the power out of the woman’s hands. A woman should have equal rights to safe, cheap contraceptives that a man does. Going on birth control ain’t cheap, and isn’t accessible for many women.
So Indiana University, good luck. I hope that you can get something viable out on the market, and that we can stop relying on skeezy dudes to spend the time tossing on a condom in the heat of the moment.
I mean, if you got a sexy lady to help you put on a condom, then why you even complaining in the first place?
Porn is often accused of warping the minds of young people, turning them into sex perverts and misogynists.
Realistically, there is no evidence that can prove that. Anyone who tries to give you statistics or a scientific study saying otherwise is wrong because there are just too many variables to concretely say that porn is the reason for bad behavior.
The problem isn’t porn but the lack of proper sex education in schools. Porn is first and foremost a form of entertainment. However, because people are so easily offended by seeing sex or even talking about sex, people turn to porn for their sex education. Where the hell else are they going to go for it? They get told abstinence is the only option at school and don’t even think about bringing it up to your councillor at Church Camp.
Porn is the only place most people get sex education because it’s the only place where sex is displayed openly. Even though it’s a form of entertainment that does not intend to be didactic at all, people still go to it to learn about sex.
I remember the first time I ever had sex (not trying to brag or nothing). Because the only thing I knew about sex was from what I had seen in porn, when I was ready to cum, I ripped off my condom and came in my partner’s face.
Needless to say, Mrs. Madison from next door wasn’t too happy. She was like, “Why did you cum in my face?” in one of the most annoyed tones of voice I have ever heard. I had made sure to tell her at some point between cleaning her pool and entering her bedroom that I was a virgin, so why she get so annoyed with me? I had no idea what I was doing, which should have been clear from that vaginal jabbing I had just given her.
I was just doing what I had seen in porn movies. Getting thrown out of Mrs. Madison’s house only moments after cumming in her face made me realize that porn was a lousy sex teacher.
But if porn is not an adequate sex education teacher…would pornstars be a better option?
One private school in Britain thinks that they might be. Continue Reading